YOU WERE LOOKING FOR: Cbrne Answers
But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary Always Enabled Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic...
Government Publishing Office] [H. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore. Government Accountability Office David, Assistant Secretary for Policy, U. Department of Homeland Security Victor E. Paul N. Department of Defense Paul N The...
I know there are a lot of competing interests, a lot of competing challenges--certainly from Afghanistan and Pakistan, Iraq, a number of different other issues--that it is easy for this to sort of slip a little bit, just because it is not happening immediately, not happening right now. It is a big threat that we want to make sure never happens. And to do that, I think we need to constantly work as much as possible to make sure that this stays a high priority for the Department of Defense and for our entire government. And that is the main purpose of our hearing is to get the update this morning on where we are at from our witnesses, who I will introduce in a moment. But first, I will turn it over to the ranking member, Mr. Miller, for any opening comments he might have. Thank you very much, Mr. I appreciate you having this timely hearing.
I thank the witnesses who are going to testify before us today. I have a statement that I would also like to have entered into the record. But we know that ensuring that DOD can provide a much- needed capability really is the reason that we are here today, and to hear testimony from Government Accountability Office GAO and DOD on the military's consequent management capability. I would like to ask that, as we delve into this critical and important topic, that I would like to hear comments on the national strategy and the national military strategy to combat weapons of mass destruction, which I am sure we will hear more about.
And as we noted in this year's defense bill, there seems to be a divergence in the application of the concepts contained in those strategy documents. So, I would like to hear your thoughts on what might be lacking, what might be effective in our overall plan in organizing to deal with this threat. And I look forward to hearing your testimony today. Miller can be found in the Appendix on page With that, I will introduce the panel, and then I will take you left to right. We have the Honorable David Heyman, who is the assistant secretary of homeland security for policy in the United States Department of Homeland Security--welcome. The Honorable Paul Stockton, who is the assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and America's security affairs, the United States Department of Defense. They don't give out short titles over at the Pentagon to anybody, I don't think.
So, welcome. Heyman, we will start with you. Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Miller, thank you for inviting me here today and for the opportunity to address you. The topic of the hearing is consequence management of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-consequence or high-yield explosive attacks--otherwise known as CBRNE. It is a topic that sits at the intersection of what I believe are three winding roads: the spread of transnational terrorism; the proliferation of nuclear weapons; and the advancement and diffusion of biotechnology.
Our top priority at the department is to secure the American people from a range of terrorist threats. So, too, is ensuring we are prepared to respond for any attack that may occur despite the nation's best efforts. Consequence management is a critical element in our nation's efforts to ensure that we are resilient in the face of an attack. We can be a more resilient nation. The more robust we are, the more agile we are responding to an attack, the more rapidly we can recover.
But I want to stress that, alongside any discussion of our ability to respond to and recover from an attack, we need to also talk about prevention. Prevention and resiliency are two sides of the same coin, or to mix metaphors, they are the yin and yang of the nation's ability to manage risk. My testimony, which I will submit for the record, focuses primarily on biological and nuclear threats, because they are particularly of high consequence. Our best CBRNE defense is to put in place national and, in some cases, international systems consisting of robust prevention, protection, response and recovery capabilities. This is not simply a DHS responsibility. It is a national interest, requiring a comprehensive, integrated and layered approach, which combines the capabilities and resources of many entities across not only the federal government, but across levels of society.
I have detailed these layers in my written statement. As Secretary Napolitano has said, one of our principal priorities within the department's all-hazard mission is to ensure that the nation can respond and recover from any incident, including terrorist attacks. A number of national security and homeland security presidential directives, including particularly HSPD-5, the Management of Domestic Incidents, further defined the department's roles and responsibilities for consequence management. These authorities are also detailed in my written statement. When we consider nuclear threats, our emphasis must be primarily on preventing an attack, because the consequences would be catastrophic.
As such, the nation's first line of defense against a nuclear attack is to ensure the control of nuclear materials and prevent the proliferation of nuclear technologies. If radiological materials and nuclear weapons cannot be controlled at its source, the next layer is to detect and interdict their movement. That is where DHS plays a critical role. Should these defenses fail, however, DHS and its partners must be ready to respond. FEMA rapidly deploys to assist state and local officials in disaster-stricken areas.
Unlike radiological and nuclear threats, however, we face a much different set of challenges with respect to bio. For biological attacks, the emphasis must be on consequence management and ensuring resiliency, because prevention is more difficult, and there are ways we can save lives after an attack to prevent it from becoming catastrophic. The biggest building blocks of the nation's biodefense strategy are to detect, to treat, to protect people from the attack, to partner with the National Center for Medical Intelligence and, finally, to strengthen the public health community at the state and local levels. Let me conclude by saying that the challenges of responding to high-consequence terrorist attacks are real. Our top priority will always be to mitigate the risk in the best possible way. Prevention and consequence management are central elements to our CBRNE defense, an approach that requires continued collaboration with our federal, state and local and international partners.
We look forward to continuing to strengthen these partnerships and, thus, to improve our nation's resilience. And we also thank the subcommittee for inviting me here today, for its support, as DHS continues to carry out this important mission. Thank you. I look forward to your questions. Heyman can be found in the Appendix on page Thank you very much. PAUL N. Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Miller, distinguished members of the committee, thanks for the opportunity to testify today. My formal statement has been submitted to the record. I would like to make some brief oral remarks now, to provide a bit of context for the substance that I have put into my prepared statement. I want to have a key goal today with you, and that is, begin a dialogue that I hope will continue for years to come.
Let me say a few words about why I hope that is going to be the case. It is my responsibility, obviously, to faithfully execute the laws. But there is much more at stake here. That is not nearly enough. Today's hearing gives me the opportunity to listen to you and learn from your perspectives as I carry out my policy responsibilities in support of the undersecretary for policy, the deputy secretary and Secretary Gates, and, most importantly, as we all work together to help strengthen the security of the United States. Let me say a few words about the importance of the missions that we are going to be discussing today. The U. But as David Heyman just mentioned--and as you did, Mr. Chairman, in your opening remarks--we also have to be prepared for the eventuality that, despite our best prevention efforts, our adversaries will succeed in conducting an attack.
DOD is going to be in support of civil authorities in responding to catastrophic natural or manmade disasters when directed by the President or as authorized by the secretary of defense. At the federal level, this means being in support of DHS and the other lead federal agencies. But it is also important to remember that federal civil authorities aren't the only ones who are vital in response and preparedness. Governors, mayors, county executives, state and local contribution to preparedness in response for disasters is absolutely vital.
It is enshrined in our Constitution. And we take that support role very, very seriously at the Department of Defense. It is something I thought a lot about as an academic, and now that I have the honor of serving here, something I am going to continue to take very, very seriously. Let me close by offering a few words of thanks.
Start studying CBRN. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The loop in which first the body of loop is executed and then condition is checked,is called post-test loop. In post test This is the second attack this month. After arriving on the scent, a veteran responder, considered a "tough guy" by his team, freezes up and is unable to continue. The Journal of Special Operations medicine peer-reviewed article index displays all of our articles listed in alphabetical order. Quickly memorize the terms, phrases and much more.
There are not any What are the Foolproof Module 3 test answers online. Preparing for the test through reviewing the study materials is best. The participant is required to take a pretest and post-test assessment and. Easily find which ACCP courses are worth the most. The purpose of this course is to provide an overview of the different types of CBRNE threats, information on how to prepare for and recognize a CBRNE threat, and instructions on protective measures. I really need to do it quickly. Online CBT's are annoying and cause you to stay at work longer. Pre Test Here is the test result. The highlighted questions are the questions you have missed. Remediation Accessed shows whether you accessed those links. Army eprc cbrne answers in digital format, so the resources that you find are reliable. Oct 26, Question, Answer. Unless they changed it recently, they give you the right answers at the end of an attempt, so you pretty much go through it, guess, write down the correct answers, and then retake it.
This whole process is a lot faster than putting up with ALMS. Steward, Aisha. Terrorists continue to enhance their technical sophistication in constructing weapons of mass destruction WMDs with devastating effects. Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive CBRNE weapons now pose a greater threat than ever before. Emphasizing basic chemistry and biology, including microbiology and human health, Terrorism and WMDs: Awareness and Response is an
DOI: Most providers lack adequate knowledge or experience in the areas of patient decontamination, hospital-specific disaster protocols, interagency familiarization, and available supply of necessary medical equipment and medications. This study evaluated the CBRNE preparedness of physicians, nurses, and midlevel providers in an urban tertiary care emergency department. Methods: This retrospective observational survey study used a previously constructed questionnaire instrument. Respondents were enrolled from February 1, to March 15, Simple frequencies of correct answers were used to determine the level of preparedness of each group.
Finally, validity coefficients and analysis of variance ANOVA were used to determine the strength of correlation between demographic variables, as well as the variation between individual responses. Results: Fifty-nine providers responded to the questionnaire The overall frequency of correct answers was Significant correlations were found between the frequency of correct answers and the respondents' gender, practice experience, and previous experience with a CBRNE incident. Significant variance exists between how providers believe casualties should be decontaminated, which drugs should be administered, and the interpretation of facility-specific protocols.
Furthermore, a valid and precise instrument capable of measuring preparedness needs to be developed. Standardized educational curriculums that consider healthcare providers' genders, occupations, and experience levels may assist in closing the knowledge gaps between providers and reinforce emergency departments' CBRNE preparedness. Publication types.
What alarm condition indicates the attach is over and cbrn contamination, uxo, and other There are practice tests available online for enlistees to study. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. SERE Cbrn defense awareness course pretest -Answers Jko cbrne defense awareness course However, there are many flash cards available online to help test takers study for it. Quickly memorize the terms, phrases and much more. Cbrn Defense Awareness Course Answers. Speak with your commanding officer to see if it is necessary for you to take this course.
This is the second attack this month. After arriving on the scent, a veteran responder, considered a "tough guy" by his team, freezes up and is unable to continue. Answers - worksgrab. Awareness of delayed effects neutralize and remove. Describe detection and possible identication steps using ones eyes. Initially he liked it but as with most jobs Sometimes he was put up in some really nice hotels and of course, all his meals were covered. Share your knowledge and get the advice you need from mothers with your experience. InfoSec institute respects your privacy and will never use your personal information for anything other than to notify you of your requested course pricing. Which command can be used to test connectivity between two computers that are attached to a network?
Consider the IP address configuration shown from PC1. What is a description of the default gateway address? Basic Level Pre-Course Reading. The CBRN First Responder Training Program was developed by an interdepartmental team of federal agencies led by the Review questions at the end of each chapter supplement learning by directing learner focus on key course content. Answers to these review CBRN defense workflow. This includes the monitoring, surveying, and reconnaissance of chemical detection and identification, as well as biological agent collection and sampling and decontamination of personnel, equipment, and casualties.
Want to practice more for FREE? Fill out the form below and immediately receive an email with additional test questions and answer key! Select the correct answer from the list below. The failure rate in a certain brand of network interface card has been You have called for the emergency response team. There is no concern for a spinal injury. What is your next best course of action?
Terrorist attacks are increasingly focused on western interests and Canada has been specifically identified as a target by terrorist organizations. Canada is also at risk from domestic sources such as radicalized individuals, extremists and criminals. This threat, aggravated by the prevalence of potential CBRNE materials normally used for industrial and scientific purposes, requires coordinated action by many contributors. Its purpose is to provide the policy framework that will guide the creation of sustainable capabilities and common standards in CBRNE policies, programs, equipment and training. The Strategy promotes the vision of an integrated capability across Canada by framing a scalable, responsive, dynamic, sustainable and evidence-based approach for all contributors to CBRNE events. The Strategy is based upon five key strategic objectives that have been agreed upon as fundamental if Canada is to achieve sustainable resilience to the risks and threats of CBRNE events.
They are: Leadership - to guide coordinated policy and program development by all levels of government and contributors that will foster and promote CBRNE resilience; Risk Management - to integrate CBRNE into a consistent all-hazards risk management approach, including robust hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment methodologies; Capability-based Planning - to inform policy, program and investment decisions based on the principles of capability-based planning.
Effective and InteroperableWorkforce - to build an effective and interoperable workforce that is supported by a modern, dynamic and responsive training infrastructure backed up by appropriate technologies; and Information and Knowledge Management - to develop effective information, knowledge and intelligence managements systems and mechanisms across all jurisdictions and contributors. The Action Plan is based on the five strategic objectives. All levels of government will work collaboratively to monitor the implementation of the Strategy and Action Plan. Strategic Context The consequences of natural and human-induced hazards and disasters have become more widespread due to increasingly urbanized and globallyinterconnected societies.
The threat and risk posed by chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives CBRNE Footnote 1 events is a global challenge. As Canada operates within the international community, it is not immune from world events which could have a profound effect on the Canadian economy, society, and way of life. The terrorist events of the last decade changed perceptions and priorities with respect to international threats and risks.
Footnote 2 Canada is also at risk from domestic extremists, radicalized individuals, and criminals. Footnote 3 The prevalence of CBRNE materials in Canadian society for use by industry, in scientific research and medical diagnostics, among other purposes, creates a significant risk of diversion or exploitation by terrorists or criminals. Terrorists have used CBRNE materials in the past, and evidence indicates that they continue to be active in pursuing and acquiring such materials. Footnote 4 Coordinated investments to improve Canada's activities in advance of, during, and after CBRNE events, based on risk assessments, are a key component of developing national resilience to such events.
Footnote 5 International Partnerships In today's complex global environment, Canada must invest in its relationships with international partners in order to facilitate the exchange of information and intelligence, enable mutual assistance and scientific cooperation, and counter the proliferation of CBRNE materials. The risk of proliferation of CBRNE materials further complicates the international security environment in which Canada operates. In recognition of the threat of terrorists gaining access to ColdWar-era weapons and materials of mass destruction, the G8 launched the Global Partnership Against the Spread ofWeapons and Materials of Mass Destruction under Canada's leadership. Footnote 7 This strategy served as important guidance towards fulfilling the federal government's responsibilities with respect to CBRN events.
No comments:
Post a Comment